Several contributors to this volume have pointed out the Western, Judeo-Christian background of our categories of the human and the divine. Some of the recent anthropological literature on kingship relegates this question of kings who deified themselves to the background or voices serious misgivings about the usefulness of the distinction between “divine” and “sacred” kings. Yet the question of the divinity of the king-the king as god-has never before been examined within the framework of a cross-cultural and multi-disciplinary conference. Endloses umlaufendes Riemchen fr Streckwerke von Spinnmaschinen Die. More recently, several conferences have been held on kingship, drawing on cross-cultural comparisons. D01H5/18 Drafting machines or arrangements without fallers or like pinned bars. The study of kingship goes back to the roots of fields such as anthropology and religious studies, as well as Assyriology and Near Eastern archaeology. The purpose of this conference was to examine more closely concepts of kingship in various regions of the world and in different time periods.
However, expenditure estimates vary considerably based on the method used to identify FRIs.This volume represents a collection of contributions presented during the Third Annual University of Chicago Oriental Institute Seminar “Religion and Power: Divine Kingship in the Ancient World and Beyond,” held at the Oriental Institute, February 23–24, 2007. Conclusions:FRIs are costly, with implications for Medicare and its beneficiaries. Estimated total FRI-related Medicare expenditures were highly variable across methods. Inpatient-treated index FRIs were more expensive than emergency department and outpatient-treated FRIs across all methods, but were substantially higher when identifying FRI using only e-codes. Patient cost-sharing was estimated at $691–$1900 across the 3 methods. In all models, most spending occurred in hospital, outpatient, and skilled nursing facility (SNF) settings, but greater proportions of SNF and outpatient spending were observed with commonly used FRI identification methods. Results:The 3 FRI identification methods produced differing distributions of index FRI type and varying estimated expenditures: $12,171, $5648 (95% CI, $3819–$7476), and $9388 (95% CI, $5969–$12,808).
Subjects:The analysis included 5497 community-dwelling adults ≥ 65 (228 FRI, 5269 non-FRI individuals) with continuous Medicare coverage and alive during the 24-month study. Linear regression models adjusted for sociodemographic, health, and geographic characteristics were used to estimate per-FRI, service component, patient cost share, expenditures by type of initial FRI treatment (inpatient, emergency department only, outpatient), and total annual FRI-related Medicare expenditures.
Research Design:Using 2007–2009 Medicare claims and 2008 Health and Retirement Survey data, FRIs were identified using external-cause-of-injury (e-codes 880/881/882/884/885/888) only, e-codes plus a broad set of primary diagnosis codes, and a newer approach using e-codes and diagnostic and procedural codes. Objectives:Compare expenditures of fall-related injuries (FRIs) using several methods to identify FRIs in administrative claims data.